Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00861
Original file (PD2012 00861.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME:    CASE: PD1200861
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20130710
SEPARATION DATE: 20020605


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (71L/Administrative Specialist) medically separated for symptomatic palpitations. In 2000, the CI was diagnosed with Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome. He was treated with ablation therapy, but did not improve adequately to fully perform his military duties or meet physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent P3 profile and underwent a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). Three conditions (palpitations, hypertension and deconditioning) were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The PEB found the symptomatic palpitations unfitting, rated 0% IAW the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The other conditions were found to be not unfitting. The CI made no appeals, and was medically separated.


CI’s CONTENTION: The CI elaborated no specific contention in his application.


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB, when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting symptomatic palpitations condition is addressed below. No other conditions are within the defined purview of the Board. Any conditions outside the Board’s scope of review may be eligible for consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Army PEB – dated 20020123
 VA* – (4 years Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Symptomatic Palpitations 7099-7010 0% W-P-W Syndrome 7010 0% 20060915
Hypertension Not Unfitting Hypertension 7101 10% 20060915
Deconditioning Not Unfitting No VA Entry 20060915
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries
 Other x 6 20060915
Combined: 0%
 Combined: 10%
* Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 60929 ( the original VARD was not in evidence)



ANALYSIS SUMMARY: IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability determinations. The Board’s role is thus confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, compared to VASRD standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation.

Symptomatic Palpitations Condition. In 2000, the CI had problems related to WPW pre-excitation syndrome. On 31 August 2000, he had successful radiofrequency ablation of a right anteroseptal accessory pathway. After the procedure, he still had palpitations, but much less than previously. In 2001, the CI was having exertional tachycardia, chest tightness, and shortness of breath. The symptoms would occur with running, stair-climbing, or other strenuous physical exercise. Due to his symptoms, he had an MEB/PEB. The MEB physical examination (PE) of heart and lungs was normal. Holter monitoring was performed on 1 November 2001. On the Holter recording, seven episodes of symptomatic palpitations were all correlated with normal sinus rhythm. No supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) was noted. The maximum heart rate was a sinus tachycardia at 128 beats per minute. As noted above, the Army PEB found him unfit due to symptomatic palpitations, and assigned a disability rating of 0%. The CI was medically separated from military service in June 2002.

Four years later, the CI had a VA Compensation and Pension exam. Blood pressure was elevated. PE of the heart and lungs was normal. The CI reported he had a blackout episode in June 2006, while vacuuming his car. The VA examiner opined that it was not possible to say what had caused the fainting spell.

The Board carefully reviewed all evidentiary information available, and directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The Army PEB coded the cardiac condition as 7099-7010 (analogous to supraventricular arrhythmia) and rated it at 0%. The September 2006 VARD also rated the cardiac arrhythmia condition at 0%. The Board determined the November 2001 Holter monitoring was performed just 7 months prior to separation, and therefore had significant probative value. On that Holter recording, seven episodes of symptomatic palpitations were all correlated with normal sinus rhythm. No SVT was noted. The maximum heart rate was a sinus tachycardia at 128 beats per minute. One episode of Mobitz 1 second degree atrioventricular (AV) block was noted. Based on his AV block, the Board deliberated at length whether VASRD diagnostic code 7015 could be applied to the CI’s cardiac condition. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the symptomatic palpitations.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the symptomatic palpitations and IAW VASRD §4.104, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:

UNFITTING CONDITION
 VASRD CODE RATING
Symptomatic Palpitations, Correlated with Sinus Rhythm 7099-7010 0%
COMBINED
 0%
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20 12 0611 , w/atchs
Exhib it B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans ’ Affairs Treatment Record




Physical Disability Board of Review


 SFMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(TAPD-ZB),

SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for AR20130016802 (PD201200861)

I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                 
                                                      (Army Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00057

    Original file (PD2009-00057.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    CI CONTENTIONS : The CI contends that neither the PEB nor the VA rating is fair. All Holter rhythm recordings and multiple EKG’s in evidence were reviewed, and it was concluded that no additional undocumented arrhythmias are demonstrable. Specifically investigated was an ER encounter during the MEB period which resulted from exertional symptoms that may have been caused by an additional episode of SVT.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00400

    Original file (PD 2012 00400.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The contended conditions adjudicated as not unfitting by the PEB were hyperlipidemia, hypertension, sleep apnea and anxiety NOS (PTSD). The Board noted that the anxiety NOS (PTSD) condition continued to improve by evidence of better sleep with treatment from May 2008 until separation according to the record. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows: UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00383

    Original file (PD2009-00383.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Despite normal tests, the CI continued to have symptoms and the Cardiologist opined his chest pain and palpitations were not cardiac conditions. The CI’s symptoms of chest pain and palpitations did not result from a cardiac condition. No VASRD code for non-cardiac chest pain and palpitations exists and the CI’s disability must be rated analogously.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00422

    Original file (PD2012-00422.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated the s/p mitral ring repair with post-operative atrial fibrillation on chronic anticoagulation and anti- arrhythmic therapy as unfitting and rated it 0%, with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). (2) is limited to those conditions which were determined by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB.”...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02514

    Original file (PD-2013-02514.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although she had normal studies, the CI continued to report syncopal episodes and was referred to the heart clinic for possible electrophysiology studies. The EKG recorded normal sinus rhythm and no signs of atrial tachycardia or an accessory pathway (successful ablation).The VA Compensation and Pensionexamdated 18 November 2005, 3 months after separation, recorded the CI’s syncopal history, diagnoses, and treatment, and indicated the condition was well controlled with medication. The...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01389

    Original file (PD2013 01389.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pre-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Vasovagal Syncope8299-821010%Tachycardia/Vasovagal Syncope7099-701110%20040401Other X 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 520040401 Rating: 10%Combined: 30%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20040612 ( most proximate to date of separation [DOS]). The Board directs attention to its rating recommendationbased on the above evidence.The PEB coded the syncopal condition analogously to 8210 for vasovagal nerve impairment. RECOMMENDATION :...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01346

    Original file (PD2013 01346.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The A-fib condition, characterized as “atrial fibrillation refractory to radiofrequency catheter oblation…possibly exercise induced” wasforwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AFI 48-123; no other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The informal PEBadjudicated the A-fib conditionas unfitting, rated 10%, referencing the Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 1332.39and Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no appeals, and was medically...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-03407

    Original file (PD-2014-03407.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The InformalPEBadjudicated “recurrent episodes of heat exhaustion/heat intolerance” including atypical chest pain in its disability descriptionas unfitting, rated 10%,with application of theVA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised.In the matter of the recurrent episodes of heat exhaustion and heat intolerance...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00624

    Original file (PD2009-00624.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    It was the opinion of the MEB that the CI, because of his physical limitations, would be unable to fulfill his duties as an active duty Marine and his case was referred to the PEB for final disposition. The VA C&P examination on 8 April 2009, one month after separation, noted that he was taking medication with no episodes of atrial fibrillation since separation; however, he had not performed any heavy exertional activities due to the order from his Cardiologists to not exercise due to the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02228

    Original file (BC-2012-02228.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The IPEB noted that she had declined further “ablation surgery.” On 9 March 2006, the applicant concurred with the findings and recommended disposition of the IPEB. The complete AFBCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit G. _________________________________________________________________ 5 APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF THE ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 15 Feb 13, by letter, the applicant amended her request and now ask to be medically retired instead of being returned to duty. ...